0400 cold war, polarization, war mongering 0600 sanctions 10 destabilization 1100 chemical weapons 400 information war, psychological war anti-democratic, pseudo-democratic, democratorship anti-russian deep state double play, false flag, moles influencing elections, election meddling, investigations thereof korea native indians pseudo-criticism (cp effect on reader is different ...) putin quotes trump zAll pages 001.000.000 Destabilisering, ledare: 1 Leadership; Trump och Putin; US elections 2020; Capitol riots, Convoy to Ottawa 2022; Biden, Democrats, Harris, Buttigieg

Only use this mirror site if is under maintenance.

(can also use tab at screen bottom right) Destabilisering genom påverkan av ledare

See also control of leaders.


Today the Western world is controlled by secret international networks. It is clear how general elections can no longer change political decisions. The objectives of the networks can be seen in the newspapers, since the media are part of the networks.

The politicians are completely controlled by these networks, one factor being the need for good publicity to be reelected. The politicians closely follow the media agenda.

One of the few threats to the networks is strong leaders. They can sometimes oppose the press and form policy.

Whether Boris Johnson is a strong leader can be discussed. But in having to carry out Brexit, that the people had voted for, the allegiances were clear: The press supported the parliament and opposed Johnson as he tried to implement the result the referendum.

The press and weak leaders counteract strong leaders in an almost ridiculous way, calling them dictators or sometimes even insinuating they would “be like Hitler”. (F.ex Putin is democratically elected. Russians can also access Western anti-Putin websites, but Putin still gets elected.)

Two strong leaders are Trump and Putin.

1. Trump och Putin

Presidenterna Trump och Putin behandlas mycket negativt av svenska media. Amerikanska media har t.o.m. hotat Trump:

CNN President Jeff Zucker has warned that “the perception of Donald Trump in capitals around the world is shaped, in many ways, by CNN. Continuing to have an adversarial relationship with that network is a mistake.”

1100 chemical weapons anti-russian iraq likely staged events skripal syria uk un, United Nations zAll pages Chemical weapons

Only use this mirror site if is under maintenance.

Chemical weapons are increasingly used as a way to accuse opponents of illegal warfare. The evidence are often extremely weak.

In two of alleged attacks with chemical weapons (Halabja, Khan Sheikoun) Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) (Doctors Without Borders) support the conclusion of gas attack, without solid evidence. Chemical weapons

Halabja 1988 The evidence of a gas attack are merely based on descriptions. Some victims were blue around the mouth and there was a smell of apple.

0600 sanctions conspiracy trolls deep state google jewish networks misguiding anger and criticism, defusing; decoys, distractions, false leads, misdirection NWO obama putin russia terminology trump usa zAll pages Deep State, New World Order, NWO; Bilderberg; nätverk, networks, congress/president power balance; Nixon; Conspiracy theories

Only use this mirror site if is under maintenance.

Deep State

The US works like Sweden. Presidents and politicians change but policy stays the same.

Trump becoming president made Deep State more visible to ordinary people since Obama and Deep State acted like one.

Assad: Why talk to Trump if he doesn’t control the US? (Russia Today, RT)

we don’t think the president of that regime [US] is in control. We all believe that the deep state, the real state, is in control, or is in control of every president, and that is nothing new. It has always been so in the United States, at least during the last 40 years, at least since Nixon, maybe before, but it’s becoming starker and starker, and the starkest case is Trump.

Bashar Hafez al-Assad, President of Syria -1- -2-

Putin (Oliver Stone)

Putin (Le Figaro)

Skripal case: Neither UK nor Russia will gain from this incident. Russia loses reputation by the accusations of using nerve gas agsins civilians, UK loses reputation by making ghe unreasonable accusations. Someone else must have orchestrated the attack. Someone else is NWO/Deep State. (Earlier the term ZOG was used. It has a bad ring and focuses on Zionism. Globalism is wider than Zionism. The term was maybe constructed by false flag trolls. Jokingly the world globalist network is sometimes called Skynet, referring to an AI network controlling the world trying to exterminate mankind, in the movie sequel Terminator. Another term used is “shadow government”.

0300 war 22200 assassinations afghanistan zAll pages Afghanistan …; air crash CIA D’Andrea

Only use this mirror site if is under maintenance.


[ Afghanistan war was fake
Afghanistan war fake
Afghanistan war is fake ]

War was fake:

* USA lost to a bunch of camel jockeys

* 911 hi-jackers were Saudi

* The evidence against Bin Laden was not accepted by the FBI (not on the 10 most wanted list)

* War continued 10 years after Bin Laden was found

* Refugees were mostly young males

* War was surrendered by the US on 20:th anniversary of 911, a few months after a Miami condominium (with many Jewish tenants) collapsed straight down, like WTC

Compare Ukraine war fake

The war in Afghanistan seems more and more like a fake war. Talibans have good relations with US ally Pakistan. The war has gone on for a long time. Sweden has nothing to do with it but takes part to motivate mass immigration from Afghanistan to Sweden. Strange incident with friendly fire killing Swedish soldiers and inability of the US to win the war.

Afghanistan has proven difficult to conquer for British, Russians and Americans. Strong conflicts between many groups of people makes it difficult to govern the country. Without central authority not even “divide and conquer” will work. Mountainous terrain gives advantage to guerilla warfare.

US supported the Taliban attacks against Soviet. Now Pakistani support Taliban against Afghan government.

2017 there were still 13000 foreign troops in A., officially fighting the Taliban.

The Soviet war in Afghanistan started in 1979

Basically the Afghan government called for Soviet help.

Soviet involvement was induced by the US:

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahiddin began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention [emphasis added throughout].

0400 cold war, polarization, war mongering 0600 sanctions anti globalist slant color revolutions effect on reader is different/opposite than/to initial impression, apparent/true_real content (cp pseudo-criticism) iran oil market pseudo-criticism (cp effect on reader is different ...) usa venezuela will occur zAll pages Venezuela 01; US tries to create a new cold war

Only use this mirror site if is under maintenance.

Jan 24, 2019

Venezuelas oppositionsledare Juan
Guaido har utropat sig själv till
tillfällig president, uppger flera
Internationella nyhetsbyråer.

Han har fått stöd av USA:s president
Donald Trump som erkänner Venezuelas
oppositionsledare som landets
tillfällige president,

Translate »