(can also use tab at screen bottom right)
Summary 04
reasons, decoys, targets, untouchables
opposite/misleading
national perspective
consequences
signs
acquire wealth
ok, not ok
exaggerations cause hatred
effects of the EU
control
conflicts, sanctions, border conflicts, uprisings, refugees (under work)
Summary 05
Summary (in Swedish)
All posts
[ snowleopard.info, on the web since 2017 ]
3.1.1.4 Destabilisering genom påverkan av ledare
See also control of leaders.
Leadership
Today the Western world is controlled by secret international networks. It is clear how general elections can no longer change political decisions. The objectives of the networks can be seen in the newspapers, since the media are part of the networks.
The politicians are completely controlled by these networks, one factor being the need for good publicity to be reelected. The politicians closely follow the media agenda.
One of the few threats to the networks is strong leaders. They can sometimes oppose the press and form policy.
Whether Boris Johnson is a strong leader can be discussed. But in having to carry out Brexit, that the people had voted for, the allegiances were clear: The press supported the parliament and opposed Johnson as he tried to implement the result the referendum.
The press and weak leaders counteract strong leaders in an almost ridiculous way, calling them dictators or sometimes even insinuating they would “be like Hitler”. (F.ex Putin is democratically elected. Russians can also access Western anti-Putin websites, but Putin still gets elected.)
Two strong leaders are Trump and Putin.
1. Trump och Putin
Presidenterna Trump och Putin behandlas mycket negativt av svenska media. Amerikanska media har t.o.m. hotat Trump:
CNN President Jeff Zucker has warned that “the perception of Donald Trump in capitals around the world is shaped, in many ways, by CNN. Continuing to have an adversarial relationship with that network is a mistake.”