The Guardian: “The wars [in #Congo] will never stop” – Well, at least not as long as the #cobaltmines don’t run dry. 18.000 UN troops protect the illegal regime fine, its mandate to rule Congo ran out in 2016! #Apple & #Tesla cheers.
The UN obstructs the murder investigation of Catalán and Sharp. Catalán had proof of Congo gov’t ordering murder but Congo gov’t is protected by UN.
Only use this mirror site if snowleopard.info is under maintenance.
Migrerande gnu/wilderbeest och zebra i Masai Mara, Kenya.
3.1.1.1 4. Flyktingar som vapen – “Weapons of Mass Migration“
The enemy within
“Every war is waged with a strategy. The most effectual war strategy is to manipulate an enemy unknowingly so that he will destroy himself step-by-step and even, where possible, dig his own grave.” [ ref ]
Att flyktingar kan användas som geopolitiska vapen står utom all tvekan. Ghadaffi och Erdogan har, vid förhandlingar, pressat EU genom att styra flyktingströmmar.
Only use this mirror site if snowleopard.info is under maintenance.
— Note! —
Many conclusions on this page must be reconsidered. After evaluating the Iran-US conflict as a whole, this blog concludes it is fake. Iran is under US control and is made to play enemy in a game similar to the cold war.
Saudi oil tankers show ‘significant damage’ after attack – Riyadh
Attack on vessels, one bound for US, follow warnings Iran or proxies could target shipping
Två saudiska, en norsk, en UAE-tanker påstås skadade. Reuters påstår sig ha sett bilder, men inget offentligt. Inget oljespill.
Only use this mirror site if snowleopard.info is under maintenance.
[ Afghanistan war was fake
Afghanistan war fake
Afghanistan war is fake ]
War was fake:
* USA lost to a bunch of camel jockeys
* 911 hi-jackers were Saudi
* The evidence against Bin Laden was not accepted by the FBI (not on the 10 most wanted list)
* War continued 10 years after Bin Laden was found
* Refugees were mostly young males
* War was surrendered by the US on 20:th anniversary of 911, a few months after a Miami condominium (with many Jewish tenants) collapsed straight down, like WTC
The war in Afghanistan seems more and more like a fake war. Talibans have good relations with US ally Pakistan. The war has gone on for a long time. Sweden has nothing to do with it but takes part to motivate mass immigration from Afghanistan to Sweden. Strange incident with friendly fire killing Swedish soldiers and inability of the US to win the war.
Afghanistan has proven difficult to conquer for British, Russians and Americans. Strong conflicts between many groups of people makes it difficult to govern the country. Without central authority not even “divide and conquer” will work. Mountainous terrain gives advantage to guerilla warfare.
US supported the Taliban attacks against Soviet. Now Pakistani support Taliban against Afghan government.
2017 there were still 13000 foreign troops in A., officially fighting the Taliban.
The Soviet war in Afghanistan started in 1979
Basically the Afghan government called for Soviet help.
Soviet involvement was induced by the US:
Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahiddin began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan on December 24, 1979. But the reality, closely guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention [emphasis added throughout].
February 2022: Russia is said to launch a full military invasion of Ukraine. Thousands of dead, 1 million refugees. This can not be true.
* Russia would only lose on this maneuvre
* This is said to be on Putins order. One man could not start such a disasterous action on his own.
* No previous demands have been made from Russia. No negotiations have preseeded the war. No reason for the war is given in the media. Later it appears that Russia “does not want Ukraine to join the NATO and have NATO weapons close to its border” and Russia wants to “denazify Ukraine”. If the situation had been real, Russia would naturally have stated these demands very clearly, before an invasion.
Ad: Later it is revealed that treaties have been signed (and broken) by both Russia and Ukraine. (To stop killing and follow the treaties is naturally what other states should convince both Russia and Ukraine to do. But other countries send weapons!)
* no photos in the newspapers of troops and fighting, mostly only ruins, often with ladies in front of them
* no videos in newspapers or uploaded from ordinary people’s phones to the internet
* almost no countermeasures from the US. Biden says “Putin will pay for this”. internationally very few actions. Much is of the type “Sweden will not play Russia in the WC” or “Russia banned from the Eurovision Song Contest” Many cases to ICC are handed in, though, but usually lead to nothing.
* war starts almost on the same day as the pandemic is called off (why not invade during olympic games?) gu, nt
* many meaningless news like “Russian tanks taken over by Ukrainians do not have to be declared in the tax form”
* today day 10. Ukraine is withstanding the Russian army! UK deputy PM: Defeating Putin in Ukraine may take years
* refugee friendly Sweden refuses to accept refugees (later changes opinion)
* Zelensky (Jewish!) never cleared out “nazi” Banderistas and let his UN ambassador vote against UN resolution to fight nazism. Azov “nazis” are not prohibited, they are even financed by Zelenskys protector Kolomoisky. This all creates a “nazi” image to “give Putin a (weak) reason to invade” and also erroneously connect nationalists to nazism.
* The war is accepted by Europe and the US. They only make weak countermessures like condemning Russia and continue to buy Russian imports. EU/Germany just diminishes gas imports by not opening the Nordstream pipeline and other imports over Poland seem to have been diminished but not any blockade. Europe is suffering, not Russia.
* Russia is accused of serious war crimes, like in Bucha but investigations do not give substantial results. In media, so far (June 6), only one Russian low rank soldier is sentenced to prison. Some airspace is closed to Lavrov. – Minor countermeasures against Russia although accusations ring loud. And Europe suffers.
* EU continues to import 1/3 of its oil from Russia
* no blockage of trade from any countries, only talk about “sanctions” with no real effect
* ships bringing fossil fuels from Russia won’t be able to dock at American ports from 22 April. theguardian.com
= free imprt for 45 days
* No country insists on drastic measures in the UN Security Council. Most politicians and media just accepts the war and hope Ukraine will win! Few diplomatic measures are taken to stop the war.
* after long time and many civilian deaths Biden only asks for Putin resignation
* images show people prepared to receive refugees, not refugees. Refugee friendly Sweden does not accept Ukrainian refugees
* Allegedly shot down uia 752 belonged to Kolomoisky (partially) owned Ukrainian International Airways!
* Petrol and diesel price rise in Europe since the war is a pretext to attack Europe financially. EU still buying oil from Russia!
* Självklart är det mycket märkligt att inte FN och andra länder kräver att Ryssland och Ukraina följer Minsk-avtalet utan istället skickar vapen så att tiotusentals människor påstås ha dött i en konflikt om ett par struntprovinser. Många debatttörer motsätter sig att folket i områdena själva får rösta fram ledare vars åsikter tillmäts stor betydlese i föhandlingarna. FN-ledda omrästningar i områdena anses otänkbart! Dessa debattrer förespråkar krig och militär makt som enda lösningsmetod. Detta extrema synsätt där regeringarna har skyldighet att militärt försvara gränser som fastslagits vid en viss punkt i historien rimmar mycket illa med samma debattörers åsikter att länder skall öppna sig globlalt och landsgränser skall ges allt mindre betydelse.
Only use this mirror site if snowleopard.info is under maintenance.
Tha Arab Spring revolutions started in Tunisia 2010. Untest spread to Libya, Egypt, Yemen, Syria and Bahrain.
Tunisia The protests were sparked by the self-immolation of Mohamed Bouazizi on 17 December 2010[14][15][16] and led to the ousting of President Zine El Abidine Ben Ali 28 days later
Soros’ Open Society funded the main opposition voice in Tunisia, Radio Kalima, which championed the riots there that led to Ben Ali’s ouster.
Only use this mirror site if snowleopard.info is under maintenance.
Bay of Pigs
Many believe that if The New York Times had not withheld crucial information, the failed (and for the US, embarrassing) invasion of Cuba would never have taken place.
It is very difficult to investigate situations like Watergate or Bay of Pigs. Any search using Google will be under heavy globalist agenda, in this case often protecting The New York Times.
Rodchenkov
The New York Times and The Washington Post contributed significantly to the ban of Russian athletes during the Olympic Games in PyeongChang in 2018. -1--2--3-
The Rodchenkov affair had notable repercussions in media over the world. Based on extremely weak evidence Russia was accused of systematic doping in sport. Jewish networks were activated: The producer of the film Icarus (of Jewish descent) contacted the New York Times (owners of Jewish descent) and the newspaper, together with the Washington Post started a spread of information where other papers followed. See “newspaper of record“. (Therefore antidoping has later been targeted by political actors.
Other similar attacks on Russia, also based on false evidence had much less impact, like “chemical weapons used by Syria”, “nerve gas attacks in UK/Salisbury”. To avoid realizing the differences between people of different ethnicities, Africans are tested harder than others for doping violations. Russian athletes must prove their innocence where others have not to.
Iraq
The New York Times (reporter Judith Miller) contributed significantly to making the US invasion of Iraq in 2003 happen. The evidence were false.
Regeringars agerande skadar ofta deras eget land, folk och t.o.m. regeringsmedlemmarna själva.
T.ex skadar svensk massinvandring Sverige och Skripaldramat skadar brittiskt anseende. T.o.m. regeringsmedlemmar (t.ex Boris Johnson) kritiseras för sina ogrundade uttalanden.
Det är svårförståeligt varför regeringar inte verkar för sitt eller landets bästa. Men det är inte de enskilda regeringarna som kontrollerar sina länder. Regeringarnas ologiska åtgärder kan bara förklaras med att de står under inflytande och agerar på andras uppdrag. En del av inflytandet utgörs ju uppenbarligen av media eftersom media stöder de ologiska åtgärderna (i dessa fall massinvandring resp. ogrundade anklagelser mot Ryssland) och inte genomför elementär källkritik etc.
I USA kallas detta inflytande Deep State. Det beskriver de delar av administrationen som inte arbetar för presidenten utan för att odemokratiskt försöka styra landet och utöva inflytande över presidenten.
För att förstå det politiska skeendet måste man frigöra sig från traditionella uppfattningar och inse att
1. Det finns krafter öveordnade regeringar.
2. Media styr politikerna.
3. Kallt krig är det viktigaste målet med USA:s politik, detta oberoende av orsaken till konflikten eller vem man har konflikt med. Förstår man inte ett utrikespolitiskt skeende kan det ofta klarläggas om man ser vilka konsekvenser det har för ett kallt krig och dess inverkan på upprustning.
Migrerande