Only use this mirror site if snowleopard.info is under maintenance.
TRANSLATE THIS PAGE:
(can also use tab at screen bottom right)
(can also use tab at screen bottom right)
Table of Contents, in English
Summary 04
Summary 04
(previews)
reasons, decoys, targets, untouchables
opposite/misleading
national perspective
consequences
signs
acquire wealth
ok, not ok
exaggerations cause hatred
effects of the EU
control
conflicts, sanctions, border conflicts, uprisings, refugees (under work)
Summary 05
Summary (in Swedish)
All posts
reasons, decoys, targets, untouchables
opposite/misleading
national perspective
consequences
signs
acquire wealth
ok, not ok
exaggerations cause hatred
effects of the EU
control
conflicts, sanctions, border conflicts, uprisings, refugees (under work)
Summary 05
Summary (in Swedish)
All posts
[ snowleopard.info, on the web since 2017 ]
Chemical weapons are increasingly used as a way to accuse opponents of illegal warfare. The evidence are often extremely weak.
In two of alleged attacks with chemical weapons (Halabja, Khan Sheikoun) Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) (Doctors Without Borders) support the conclusion of gas attack, without solid evidence.
3.1.2.13 Chemical weapons
Halabja 1988 The evidence of a gas attack are merely based on descriptions. Some victims were blue around the mouth and there was a smell of apple.